Lloydinho77
23rd February 2010, 09:24 AM
Cliff notes included at the end as I realise I've written more than I intended to
A general question really which can be applied to all 1 on 1 sports, if not all sports in general.
At what point is it acceptible to end a sporting encounter without shaking your opponents hand?
The general consesus I guess is "never." I certainly believe that you should always be willing to offer a handshake at the end of a game played in a sporting manner regardless of how bad you feel at the end and I am certainly not asking of you can be forgiven for not shaking your opponents hand when you lose/play badly.
I ask as I have just seen a mosconi cup game where Earl Strickland and Daryl Peach were having a heated debate between shots. Before the final rack Daryl approached Earl to let him know that he would "see [him] outside after the game"
Clearly these two men disliked eachother and in an interview after the game Peach branded Strickland "the scum of the earth." Yet they still shook hands breifly after the final 9 ball was sunk.
I am no angel and was frequently referred to as "talented but tempramental" on a tennis court. I would often get frustrated and argue with my opponents if I felt they were treating me unjustly in a (self-umpired) league game. As a rule I would always shake hands at the end of the game. Once or twice I walked off the court and drove home without saying a word to my opponents or shaking their hands.
On these occassions I was CONFIDENT (key word) that they had not played within the spirit of the game: calling balls wrongly in their favour, speaking to me in a patronising manner (I was often much younger than my opposition) and other things which go against ettiquette in tennis such as hitting balls to the opposite side of the court to you when "passing" them back and slowing down/interferring with the rhythm of your play outside of the game especially when you are serving.
I am not trying to justify my behaviour on these occasions. It has only happened once or possibly twice in a long history of playing many different sports. I have captained football and tennis teams and I have umpired finals in regional junior tennis events - I am a sporting and just person and very passionate about what I do.
I wonder how many of you feel there is a theoretical point where refusing a handshake at the end of a game is justified or not and if so describe it. Perhaps there is a real life scenario where you refused a handshake and you feel it was justified?
To anybody who thinks they will never play a game without offering a handshake at the end of it. Why is a handshake so integral?
Cliffs: Is there any scenario where you wouldn't shake hands at the end of a game. why/why not?
A general question really which can be applied to all 1 on 1 sports, if not all sports in general.
At what point is it acceptible to end a sporting encounter without shaking your opponents hand?
The general consesus I guess is "never." I certainly believe that you should always be willing to offer a handshake at the end of a game played in a sporting manner regardless of how bad you feel at the end and I am certainly not asking of you can be forgiven for not shaking your opponents hand when you lose/play badly.
I ask as I have just seen a mosconi cup game where Earl Strickland and Daryl Peach were having a heated debate between shots. Before the final rack Daryl approached Earl to let him know that he would "see [him] outside after the game"
Clearly these two men disliked eachother and in an interview after the game Peach branded Strickland "the scum of the earth." Yet they still shook hands breifly after the final 9 ball was sunk.
I am no angel and was frequently referred to as "talented but tempramental" on a tennis court. I would often get frustrated and argue with my opponents if I felt they were treating me unjustly in a (self-umpired) league game. As a rule I would always shake hands at the end of the game. Once or twice I walked off the court and drove home without saying a word to my opponents or shaking their hands.
On these occassions I was CONFIDENT (key word) that they had not played within the spirit of the game: calling balls wrongly in their favour, speaking to me in a patronising manner (I was often much younger than my opposition) and other things which go against ettiquette in tennis such as hitting balls to the opposite side of the court to you when "passing" them back and slowing down/interferring with the rhythm of your play outside of the game especially when you are serving.
I am not trying to justify my behaviour on these occasions. It has only happened once or possibly twice in a long history of playing many different sports. I have captained football and tennis teams and I have umpired finals in regional junior tennis events - I am a sporting and just person and very passionate about what I do.
I wonder how many of you feel there is a theoretical point where refusing a handshake at the end of a game is justified or not and if so describe it. Perhaps there is a real life scenario where you refused a handshake and you feel it was justified?
To anybody who thinks they will never play a game without offering a handshake at the end of it. Why is a handshake so integral?
Cliffs: Is there any scenario where you wouldn't shake hands at the end of a game. why/why not?