Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

One Piece or 3/4 ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • One Piece or 3/4 ?

    Been playing this game for about 28 years and had more cues than 28 !!

    In all those years , until now , i have always used a 3/4 jointed cue . Not a clue why either

    After using my one piece for a couple of months , i don't think that if i bought another cue i would revert back to a 3/4 cue .

    Don't know what it is but really like a one piece cue .

    Any one else done this or went from a one piece to 3/4 ?
    Still trying to pot as many balls as i can !

  • #2
    Went from a 3/4 plain black ebony to a 1 piece and never looked back. As no two cues play the same, could just be that cue works better for you. Although i do like the look.of a one piece. Just feels and looks complete. Less problems that can arise later on in its life too.

    Comment


    • #3
      I moved to a one piece cue about 5 years back from 3/4s and just think you have more "feel" in the balls, and you can rely on less going wrong with the cue as I've had many joint problems with split cues previously.

      Comment


      • #4
        my first cue was a 2pc, then I got a 1pc snooker cue and my game improved dramatically as it just felt so much more "solid" and the feel of the shots was more communicative.
        Then I got a 3/4 pool cue, and I have no problem going from one to the other.
        I have played pool with the snooker cue, and snooker with the pool cue, and I would say that snooker is better with the snooker cue (being 9.5mm) then the pool cue (8.2mm) but in general I can play well with both.
        not much help eh!?
        Up the TSF! :snooker:

        Comment


        • #5
          I have a couple of cues made by MW and they are both 3/4 and they play and look like a 1 pce with the hidden join so I have the best of both worlds

          Comment


          • #6
            i once went from a one piece, to a 3/4. but it was made has a one piece but jointed above the splices. JRC750 knows the cue ( parris traditional)

            played great, felt like a one piece. still dont know why i got rid of that one.
            i know now not to blame cue but myself

            Comment


            • #7
              Neil, were 3/4 cues around 28 years ago? I bought my first cue 30 years ago and opted for a centre jointed one just for the ease of transport. At the time I can't remember if 3/4 was an option. When do you think 3/4 were generally available? Anyone know who the first pro to use a 3/4 was? I know John Spencer was credited with being the first to use a centre jointed cue. That would have been around the mid 70's. I like to know the history of these things.

              Comment


              • #8
                Seem to recall that i bought my 1st 3/4 cue from Keith Auld about 25 years . So 28 years ago i was probably using a cheap centre jointed cue .
                Still trying to pot as many balls as i can !

                Comment


                • #9
                  Same here more 3/4 cues than I care to remember. 2 weeks ago I bought 2 one piece cues. Would never go back now. The hit is totally different, and I'm cueing much better
                  "When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it." - Henry Ford

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I was playing with a one piece thai cue, once I got a JP champion 3/4 cue, I got rid of the tai cue, I think as long as the shaft is good, it makes a good cue no matter it's a one piece or a 3/4 anyways.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      started with 3/4 cues but when i started making them became a 1 piece fan mainly because of designs i could create.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        why in the snooker cue not use joint connection tree to tree . this connection gives an approximate sense of integrityкий Малеев Боко&#1.jpgveng_3-765x575.jpg

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          it's a nice debate Neil. As a matter of fact, I am actually thinkking about going one piece as well. I currently have a nice 3/4 Parris Superior cue but find it a bit heavy (19.5 lbs) and I'm eyeing some changes so I was like 'why not going one-piece'. It is supposed to give you a better feelign and some of the commetns above seem to confirm that feeling. I might even switch to maple....:P
                          Ton Praram III Series 1 | 58" 18.4oz 9.4mm | ash shaft + 4 splices of Brazilian Rosewood | Grand Cue medium tips

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            A 1 pièce you can have a lot lighter cue

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Yep indeed, it is part of my reasonning as well...
                              Ton Praram III Series 1 | 58" 18.4oz 9.4mm | ash shaft + 4 splices of Brazilian Rosewood | Grand Cue medium tips

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X