New Screw Back Technique

[Ramon]

Nobody can do what is impossible outside the laws of physics Ramon, we are all bound by them, that's how our universe and everything in it works,unless they are God and he's fictional, it's just not true. I don't know why you seem to attach some type of mystical power to someone who's good at a pointy stick and ball game, there is none. Their ability to play the game at a higher standard than most is no harder to explain than any other top sportsmans ability and none of them are bending or breaking any scientific laws, if you can prove they are there is at least a Nobel prize waiting for you as you will have rewritten the whole of human understanding as to how the universe works.

My friend, if you had take ur time to read the post 59, apart of your answer was already given?

If that would'nt be possible according to you, no player in the world is able to accelerate the CB ( as you described : good at a pointy stick and ball game ? ) .

your knowledge is extremely high, really hard to catch up.

But I'm gonna give it a try. Please take your time to read this post. it can do no harm if read it abit more carefuly.

A heavier cue at the same speed will transfer more energy. something slasher mentioned ( laws of physics ) and I agree with.
Hendry played with a 17 OZ cue.
So, let's just say Hendry plays a SCW backshot and generating amount of spin on CB.
according to science, if Hendry plays the same shot, at the same speed, with a 18oz cue, he should be able to generate more spin on CB relative to the first shot he Pulled off with a 17oz cue.

So, why he did'nt changed his cue? why he did'nt buy a 18oz cue in order to generate more spin and Not to mention, making his own work easier and more comfortable ??
he did'nt because he was able to generate the same amount of spin with a 17oz cue , as much as he could do it with a 18oz cue at the same shot. and That's the moment when the player beat the science . ( timing /acceleration / and .......... pointy stick and ball game ?? )
this can be appelied to acceleration too.

In other words, you can play with any cue that suits your game (17/16/19/18 OZ) . It's your choice .
But at the end of the day, it all comes up to your technique.

I'm gonna buy a heavier cue in order to generate more spin and play a better SCW backshot just bcuz Newton said more Mass lead to more Energy : IS NOTHING MORE THAN A MYTH.

Back to the practice table !!


hope this is okey , otherwise i'm gonna have to put that Nobel prize out of my mind

[Slasher]

Ramon, Here is an excerpt from an old Billiards digest article that explains the dynamics, it is referring to breaking the balls but the same laws apply to a playing cue. .

Cue and tip efficiency can also affect breaking performance. Changing from a medium-hardness leather tip on a typical playing cue (typical COR = 0.73) to a phenolic tip on a break cue (with a COR as high as 0.87), can increase breaking power by 17%! For comparison purposes (see the end of TP A.30 for details), if you could increase your cue speed by 10%, the cue ball speed would also increase by 10%, and the effective increase in breaking power would be 21%. And for a given cue speed, if you could increase the cue weight from 17 to 22 oz (while maintaining the same speed), the cue ball speed would increase by 6.3%, which would correspond to an effective increase in breaking power of 13%. So with a dramatic increase in cue weight (17 oz to 22 oz), the benefit is not as large as one might expect, even if the heavier cue could be stroked at the same speed as the lighter cue (which is usually not the case).

Oh and here is the math if you care about such things
http://billiards.colostate.edu/techn...ew/TP_A-30.pdf

[pottr]

New Screw Back Technique

All getting a bit silly now, gents.

The OP highlighted a good point for beginners and now we're picking the bones out of an argument which exists outside of anything that matters

[Slasher]

Yes, we should all get back to bashing Rory or discussing which tip is best for 23-1/2" stun shots with a touch of left.

[itsnoteasy]

Deek at this fella, he's damned near invented time travel!
https://youtu.be/eZ5c6LJVzx8

[Slasher]

Or how about using a different club
https://youtu.be/7cUjDprCcWk

[Big Splash!]

Deek at this fella, he's damned near invented time travel!
https://youtu.be/eZ5c6LJVzx8

Low, straight, accelerating, hard, leaving chalk on the deck. Just as me and Pottr have basically said. Yes, it requires timing; which comes from practice.

[itsnoteasy]

Low, straight, accelerating, hard, leaving chalk on the deck. Just as me and Pottr have basically said. Yes, it requires timing; which comes from practice.

And a mahoosive twist of the wrist inward, check out the third shot!