Sidespin on a snooker table both with and against the nap

[travisbickle]

The same shot as j6's first turn it in video but played a bit harder to go up for the blue, dead easy really when you've been playing with side for nearly forty years and know what the cue ball is going to do. Biggie and travis are somehow deluded that I struggle to make a 30 break, but the fact is my highest match break is 86 and I had a total clearance in practise once and have made many 50's 60's and 70's. OK so not two centuries a week, but I take that with a pinch of salt from someone of that alledged standard who doesn't let on who he is and posts a few easy side shot videos that I was making when I was 17 a week after being shown how to do it from an old billiards bloke who played in our pool team, basic stuff really.
If I was making two or more tons a week everyone would know who I was and I'd have the trophies to prove it too, and for the likes of Ramon to have a dig, really, highest break of 16 and he has the nerve to preach to me :hopelessness: nothing short of embarrassing himself.



Actually biggie, striking the cue ball unitentionally off the vertical centre line results in deflection off the line of aim (watch that predator video I linked to again) and that's why the OB is missed if you're not compensating your aiming to allow for it as you do when deliberately striking off the vertical centre line on the cue ball as you do when playing with side. Thought you could play with side biggie, sounds again like you haven't a cue.

Lol! You are one funny guy.
I challenge you to replicate my shot if you are the expert on side that you say you are!?

[Terry Davidson]

without getting too technical tel, say if your on a straight black and you can only see 3/4 of it do you go for it or not? if not why not?

If it was set up like on your first video then likely I would with some RH side to kick the red up a bit or not as the case may be. I would have to actually see the shot though.

[throtts]

I can't recall seeing a black like this potted in a comp..??

[j6uk]

If it was set up like on your first video then likely I would with some RH side to kick the red up a bit or not as the case may be. I would have to actually see the shot though.

its this shot, tel you trying to forget about it already? i walk around this shot in the video showing every conceivable angle. this 3/4 ball pots straight? can you see bob?

[Terry Davidson]

its this shot, tel you trying to forget about it already? i walk around this shot in the video showing every convertible angle. this 3/4 ball pots straight? can you see bob?

To me it appears I can contact BOB to the far knuckle using RH side. I don't believe the 2* of throw makes much difference.

I've had enuff of this stuff and am ready to concede defeat if only to stop having to defend what I think. I'm in the middle of a practice session with my mate anyway and he's up 5-2 so far.

[Hello, Mr Big Shot]

I'm just happy to get up each morning healthy and have a chance to ignore all the 'experts' on here who have the latest theory. I would have used straight drag on that shot with no side and it doesn't show anything but a straight forward pot. You try playing well when at the same time you are commentating on what you're doing.

I know you're knocking on a bit but i wouldn't call something proven in 1835 to be the' latest theory' if i were you.

[j6uk]

To me it appears I can contact BOB to the far knuckle using RH side. I don't believe the 2* of throw makes much difference.

I've had enuff of this stuff and am ready to concede defeat if only to stop having to defend what I think. I'm in the middle of a practice session with my mate anyway and he's up 5-2 so far.

fair enough sorry to disturb, you try get back in to the match.

[Hello, Mr Big Shot]

Yes Travis that's fine but what you and Biggy have done is show average players a very skilled shot which is beyond most of them. The most important thing for a learning player to accomplish is to learn how to deliver the cue straight. I've seen in this string and the other one players showing their lack of knowledge even on whether a cueball throws when side is used (I'm not talking about you here). Snooker players have been bending balls for over 100 years but although they knew and know how to use spin in these shots they have never heard of CIT & SIT and to every one of them the terminology doesn't matter nor does it matter that they understand the physics.

You are a player who runs 2 or more tons as week and I think that puts you beyond virtually all the players on here. I doubt pottr or j6uk now run 2 a week, nor do vmax and myself. We all may have at one time but age and lack of practice and playing have caught up with us. Look at Ramon, who says his high break is 16. Do you really think he's ready to use side the way you do? I would like to see players avoid as much as possible the use of specialized side until the time they can deliver a cue consistently straight which usually takes a very long time of constant practice and then they can graduate to these more specialized skills.

Object ball throw has quite a few problems which have become apparent in this discussion. First of all we all have shown we see the availability of a shot differently as I disagreed with both j6uk and Oma regarding how much of the ball could be seen. Now layer on the facts that too much speed and too much spin negate the shot and also as you so aptly demonstrate you have to hit the OB at dead pocket weight in order for it to work. In the end two players can look at a shot and come to a different conclusion, besides which potting a black at dead weight is playing very negatively as you're just grabbing the 7 points with no hope of getting position unless there's a ball over the pocket somewhere. (I'm not talking about throwing a ball in with side with a lot of pace like Oma's.) See where his cueball ended up, so he was able to pot the ball with side but more power so by your own rules no SIT helped his shot. And it mostly went centre-pocket. However, Oma is convinced SIT played a part, more power to him.

Leave these specialized shots to pool where the average player can use them because of the large margin of error.

Lol.

......

[Terry Davidson]

I know you're knocking on a bit but i wouldn't call something proven in 1835 to be the' latest theory' if i were you.

Up until your 'revelation' I've never seen or heard anything about CIT & SIT. You would think if it was true it would have been promulgated world-wide in the billiards community so some must not have believed your Frenchman or else no one gave a flying f***, just like me.

[Hello, Mr Big Shot]

Not everyone is a beginner on here.
Judging by some of the comments I've seen on all 3 threads there is a lot of players who's game has improved knowing what OBs do when you use side without cushions.
I've never said these were shots for beginners at any time, but there is no harm in trying these shots out in practise.
It will only make you a better player in the long run.

The Cruyff turn ruined my life!

As for that fool fosbury, don't get me started on him. We were all quite happy straddling the high jump until he came along and ruined it for everyone. Grrr.

[travisbickle]

Up until your 'revelation' I've never seen or heard anything about CIT & SIT. You would think if it was true it would have been promulgated world-wide in the billiards community so some must not have believed your Frenchman or else no one gave a flying f***, just like me.

Mostly you & vmax it seems

[travisbickle]

The Cruyff turn ruined my life!

As for that fool fosbury, don't get me started on him. We were all quite happy straddling the high jump until he came along and ruined it for everyone. Grrr.

:biggrin-new::biggrin-new::biggrin-new:

[Hello, Mr Big Shot]

Up until your 'revelation' I've never seen or heard anything about CIT & SIT. You would think if it was true it would have been promulgated world-wide in the billiards community so some must not have believed your Frenchman or else no one gave a flying f***, just like me.

Ah, so you hadn't heard about CIT until recently then? Check mate, mate.

And this IS promulgated world wide in the billiard community. Only snooker, a small niche branch of pocket billiards, is unaware of it. The rest of cue sports are shaking their heads in disbelief.

[Hello, Mr Big Shot]

The same shot as j6's first turn it in video but played a bit harder to go up for the blue, dead easy really when you've been playing with side for nearly forty years and know what the cue ball is going to do. Biggie and travis are somehow deluded that I struggle to make a 30 break, but the fact is my highest match break is 86 and I had a total clearance in practise once and have made many 50's 60's and 70's. OK so not two centuries a week, but I take that with a pinch of salt from someone of that alledged standard who doesn't let on who he is and posts a few easy side shot videos that I was making when I was 17 a week after being shown how to do it from an old billiards bloke who played in our pool team, basic stuff really.
If I was making two or more tons a week everyone would know who I was and I'd have the trophies to prove it too, and for the likes of Ramon to have a dig, really, highest break of 16 and he has the nerve to preach to me :hopelessness: nothing short of embarrassing himself.



Actually biggie, striking the cue ball unitentionally off the vertical centre line results in deflection off the line of aim (watch that predator video I linked to again) and that's why the OB is missed if you're not compensating your aiming to allow for it as you do when deliberately striking off the vertical centre line on the cue ball as you do when playing with side. Thought you could play with side biggie, sounds again like you haven't a cue.

Good players don't need to adjust for deflection mate.

[throtts]

Good players don't need to adjust for deflection mate.

You are relentless..