Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2016 World Championship discussion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • gavpowell
    replied
    Originally Posted by Guy3103 View Post
    I don't know how you can spend 17 days playing... years and years practicing and then have such a reaction after winning what is supposed to be the biggest one of them all. There was so little emotion and so little heart in this final that I find it sad and embarrassing to world snooker.
    Hendry always said he never got much joy out of his finals because it was just relief it was over and then time to start the process again. But I agree, whatever Selby's personal problems are, they appear to be pretty serious judging by his appearance throughout the tournament. I hope it's something he can resolve, because he's led a life like a character from Russian literature!

    Leave a comment:


  • Guy3103
    replied
    I don't know how you can spend 17 days playing... years and years practicing and then have such a reaction after winning what is supposed to be the biggest one of them all. There was so little emotion and so little heart in this final that I find it sad and embarrassing to world snooker.

    Leave a comment:


  • jb134
    replied
    Anyone who hates the way Selby plays, does not understand the game. He has a mind like a steel trap, his execution is magnificent and unlike other so called "better to watch" players he has the will to win and intellect not to try to play his top game when it isn't there.

    He has just won two WCs in three years and the Internet opinion brigade want to slaughter him. People who sat in their houses and watched him while he was earning another few hundred grand.

    Leave a comment:


  • richo
    replied
    I have been accused of being negative on Selby, and true I don't really like his style of play, But, he fully deserved to win the final. His mental strength and tactical mastery are clear to see and in those departments he is stronger than anybody else on tour, including O'Sullivan. Going back 10-20 years, I think only Hendry or Higgins at his best would be able to match him mentally and tactically. So I say well done to Selby.

    Leave a comment:


  • liquid_symphony
    replied
    Originally Posted by The Rook View Post
    Very impressive feat really. Even O'Sullivan, Higgins and Williams haven't managed to stay at the top with that level of consistency.
    Yep , buy only à few tournaments ay the time , and ranking only based on points , not money earned even in invitational évents .....

    Leave a comment:


  • The Rook
    replied
    Originally Posted by JimMalone View Post
    On a side-note this result of the World Championship means Mark Selby will finish the season as World Number #1 for the fifth time. A feat that so far only Stephen Hendry (9 times), Steve Davis (7 times), Ray Reardon (6 times) and Ronnie O'Sullivan (5 times as well) achieved.
    Very impressive feat really. Even O'Sullivan, Higgins and Williams haven't managed to stay at the top with that level of consistency.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tufbo
    replied
    BBC reports Selby is "over the moon"
    My GF upon seeing him winning: "I look 10 times happier when I wake up 5 minutes before the alarm"

    Leave a comment:


  • JimMalone
    replied
    On a side-note this result of the World Championship means Mark Selby will finish the season as World Number #1 for the fifth time. A feat that so far only Stephen Hendry (9 times), Steve Davis (7 times), Ray Reardon (6 times) and Ronnie O'Sullivan (5 times as well) achieved.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Rook
    replied
    Originally Posted by Tim65 View Post
    I never said Selby won by one frame.Nor do I hate Selby.And Im not a clown.
    I didn't say that you hated Selby, or that you were a clown. I did say that the luck argument has been used and reused many times on this forum against Selby for more than 5 years. It's tiresome, pathetic, and if anyone still truly believes it then I think to call them a clown would be quite kind (and I'm not referring to you).

    Leave a comment:


  • Tim65
    replied
    Originally Posted by JimMalone View Post
    I agree he had a fairly easy draw. The only player before him to win the world title by beating only one seed was Neil Robertson in 2010 I think. But you could argue that Ding is a stronger player than most of the seeds of this world championship.
    Fair point.

    Leave a comment:


  • Le Ball Sack
    replied
    Its not just a few of us that has a problem with Selbys game. Even Davis alluded to the fact some people i.e. players hates the way he plays. In fact Hendry seems to hate the guy.

    Leave a comment:


  • JimMalone
    replied
    Originally Posted by Tim65 View Post
    Agreed.I actually like the tactical stuff & its amazing how he can impose his will on a match.He reminds me very much of Ray Reardon.I still think he had a good run of the ball in the final but maybe you make your own luck.Its a fact that the highest ranked opponent he had was no14 seed Marco Fu so he did have an easy draw.
    I agree he had a fairly easy draw. The only player before him to win the world title by beating only one seed was Neil Robertson in 2010 I think. But you could argue that Ding is a stronger player than most of the seeds of this world championship.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tim65
    replied
    Originally Posted by The Rook View Post
    Selby won the match by 4 frames, not 1, so it was a reasonably convincing margin. Anyway, luck has always been one of the staple arguments of "Why Selby Wins" by the haters. In 2011 there were certain prolific posters on these boards who were of the opinion that Selby is the worst No1 in history, a fluke No1, and just filling in briefly prior to Trump's imminent Hendryesque style dominance. Funnily enough, Selby has finished every season since at No1, and won two World Championsips, but some of these clowns still think it's down to his superior luck. I suppose little has changed really.
    I never said Selby won by one frame.Nor do I hate Selby.And Im not a clown.

    Leave a comment:


  • jonny66
    replied
    I hope Selby doesn't read this thread, he seems to have enough problems.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tim65
    replied
    Originally Posted by zzeezzy View Post
    Ding contributed to Selby's run of the ball with the mistakes he made when he was put in awkward positions.

    Look I'm not saying it is pretty by any means but the guy is just a serial winner and I admire how he can the best break builders in the game by playing his way. People on here seem to be thinking that the game is all about potting and break building, whereas in fact that is a whole other side to the game that is just as important.

    For the record my favourite player is Shaun Murphy, but I'll be the first to admit that the reason he hasn't won more in his career is because if his A game doesn't work, he doesn't win.

    Ding showed a lot of tenacity in this final and mixed it up well, but he just came up against a better match snooker player.
    Agreed.I actually like the tactical stuff & its amazing how he can impose his will on a match.He reminds me very much of Ray Reardon.I still think he had a good run of the ball in the final but maybe you make your own luck.Its a fact that the highest ranked opponent he had was no14 seed Marco Fu so he did have an easy draw.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X