Originally Posted by Fuu
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
China Open match discussions thread
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally Posted by hegeland View PostWas Selby's match televised?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by Alex0paul View PostLooks like Murphy is all but number 1 now given his draw here and at the worlds.Or is it something similar to reverse psychology? Or maybe just the uttering of all this has annulled such a perspective?
How I wish you'd be wrong.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by Alex0paul View PostLooks like Murphy is all but number 1 now given his draw here and at the worlds.
but didn't we all fear that last year around?
http://www.thesnookerforum.com/board...ead.php?t=9258
Alex, did you update your rankings yet?
Leave a comment:
-
Looks like Murphy is all but number 1 now given his draw here and at the worlds.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by Perry View PostWelcome here-p'tit ruxi-though it is not the best start with Ronnie losingwell...next will be better
and next time is the Crucible
Leave a comment:
-
Welcome here-p'tit ruxi-though it is not the best start with Ronnie losing
Leave a comment:
-
i, personally, loved the way ronnie played today. ok i admit those shots were weird, and i will never understand why he went for them. but ronnie played like he used to: fast and brilliant. he played for the audience which is really what matters to me. it's his way of playing and i don't think it was dissrespectful to marco. i'm sad ronnie lost but i'm happy to have seen him enjoying the game(It was the most relaxed ronnie i've seen in a long time) and playing to please the audience.
p.s.: nice to meet you all herei'm new around. will get me some time to get used here.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by snookersfun View Postawww, will do my best then, try to channel energy though
Leave a comment:
-
So...Selby and Carter won their matches......that means I won a nice amount of money.......i think iwill have a drink or two......
Leave a comment:
-
Just an example here again of some Ronnie-dislikers (to put it mildly) trying to slate O'Sullivan for his very entertaining play. As is mostly the case there is a strong tendency to base the 'arguments' on actual facts but then actually distort them. E.g. you state that Ronnie O'Sullivan is playing very fast (correct) and conclude that he actually doesn't care/ doesn't respect Marco Fu (both very doubtable conclusions).
It's one thing when you don't like O'Sullivan or his behaviour but it's wrong to express these opinions by distorting/ twisting actual facts against him. So instead of accusing O'Sullivan for this or that on arguable grounds why not just say you don't like him?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by snooky147 View PostMy point is April that a Ronnie O'Sullivan that actually cared what happened would never have played those shots. His general demeanour around the table was one of he could not care less. You have to see that frame to understand.Well, he deserves to lose if he plays like that, what else can I say?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by Fuu View Postit's TWO U!!!!!!!!! don't steal my second u, I beg you ^^
already noticed and corrected, sorry
and yay, well done we haveafraid you'll have to back him allone tomorrow though, i wont be able to be online OR watch the match, which basically equals dying.
anyway, finally able to do something now, too
good day to you and the rest of the forum., try to channel energy though
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: