Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sidespin on a snooker table both with and against the nap

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • travisbickle
    replied
    Originally Posted by pottr View Post
    I took the vids down.

    gonna record them again but a bit clearer.

    The tin of beans idea is good

    I've said all along that I could be wrong... many times. I won't lose sleep if I am because it really is irrelevant knowledge in terms of your standard at snooker.

    Talks a good game?

    Anytime you're ready for a best of 19 biggie, we'll film that and let the footage do the talking.

    I've played 4/5 people off the forum... who have you played?
    I disagree Pottr.

    This stuff is good to learn for precise break building.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cue crafty
    replied
    Originally Posted by pottr View Post
    cue crafty wins a quid
    This is a special day! Only 3 more posts for a thousand replies. Who said Snooker's dead? It's rising from the ashes majestically!

    I'm on a diet so am going to spend my quid on a 3rd of a pint at lunch time. 😎

    Leave a comment:


  • pottr
    replied
    Sidespin on a snooker table both with and against the nap

    cue crafty wins a quid

    Leave a comment:


  • pottr
    replied
    Sidespin on a snooker table both with and against the nap

    I took the vids down.

    gonna record them again but a bit clearer.

    The tin of beans idea is good

    I've said all along that I could be wrong... many times. I won't lose sleep if I am because it really is irrelevant knowledge in terms of your standard at snooker.

    Talks a good game?

    Anytime you're ready for a best of 19 biggie, we'll film that and let the footage do the talking.

    I've played 4/5 people off the forum... who have you played?
    Last edited by pottr; 14 September 2017, 08:16 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hello, Mr Big Shot
    replied
    Yay!

    (My first ton anorl).

    Leave a comment:


  • Hello, Mr Big Shot
    replied
    Christ, i wish this page would hurry up and turn to a hundred - I've got to get to work!

    Leave a comment:


  • Hello, Mr Big Shot
    replied
    Originally Posted by travisbickle View Post
    Will this be vmax' s first ton lol
    I reckon vmax has been practising this like crazy for the past few weeks.

    B-b-but it can't move, it simply can't {simper}.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hello, Mr Big Shot
    replied
    Originally Posted by travisbickle View Post
    Just try the example Big Shot posted.
    Put the pink on its spot with the CB a couple of inches behind it.
    Play the shot full ball up the table with left/right hand side and see what happens.
    Now go and pot some balls using what you have just seen to your advantage.
    The subtle version of the shot is easy and can be learned by anyone in weeks.
    The more you want to throw the OB the harder the shot becomes, just like the difference between screwing the white 6 inches compared to 10 feet.

    To be fair, it's not an easy thing to control. The likes of vmax mastering it is doubtful, and potting in snooker is difficult enough as it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hello, Mr Big Shot
    replied
    Originally Posted by matthias View Post
    what happened......
    Nothing. Pottr talks a good game though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hello, Mr Big Shot
    replied
    Originally Posted by Terry Davidson View Post
    I've found they slide more than spin or the cueball 'climbs' the OB which I think is static electricity between a neutral OB and a charged CB.

    Tomorrow I'm going to put some chalk on my OB and see what happens.
    Er, nope.

    Some people have suggested that a kick can be caused directly by static electricity, but this is highly questionable (per logic, and per the test at the 3:44 point in NV D.16 - Pool ball cut-induced throw and cling/skid/kick experiment). Although, a possible explanation is that static (resulting from the balls sliding across the cloth) could indirectly cause cling by somehow allowing chalk dust to collect on and stick to the balls more easily (but this is also questionable).

    http://billiards.colostate.edu/threads/throw.html#cling

    See experiment at 3.44 of NV D16

    Leave a comment:


  • Cue crafty
    replied
    Originally Posted by Terry Davidson View Post
    Well, I liked Thorburn beating Higgins. I didn't like it the 4 or 5 times he beat me dammit. Was that me who said 'it definitely doesn't pot'? I thought I said it definitely doesn't spin, maybe 1/8th turn (if that). Transferred spin is 'fake news' to me.
    No Terry I was talking about Pottr. Saying that made it feel like it was a magician trick. Like Paul Daniels saying I've got nothing up my sleeve. Lol. I was only a kid when Cliff beat Alex I was gutted at the time and remember it clearly. Cliff deserved that win and was a great player.

    Leave a comment:


  • matthias
    replied
    Originally Posted by markz View Post
    Here's pottr's link

    https://youtu.be/qFQm_FfVLS4
    what happened......

    Leave a comment:


  • j6uk
    replied
    Originally Posted by j6uk View Post
    a bit of helping side just to turn it in and hold the white, so as not to go in and out of balk.

    https://youtu.be/yWMawCHxSFM?t=7m
    Originally Posted by Terry Davidson View Post
    C'mon guys,
    But is transferred side useful even if it did exist? Can it be controlled? It took pottr quite a few attempts to finally pot that pink...shoot the blue fer christ's sake.
    rons red to the middle above shows simple control in open play, judgment and practice.

    Leave a comment:


  • travisbickle
    replied
    Originally Posted by Terry Davidson View Post
    C'mon guys, we're at page 99 now and that's pretty good and should go in the record books for vmax. Mr.B.S. deserves special mention for presenting the opposing argument or proven facts as he says.

    The earth is flat, the twin towers was a CIA plot, NASA is lying about the moon landing (even though you can see footprints with a good telescope), Mr. B.S. has faith in SIT, god is real, we all go to heaven or hell, christian fundamentalists managed to change the path of Irma through prayer (they're claiming), Donald Trump never lies and someone on here believes in transferred side (generated by a kick). They're all a bit dodgy in my opinion.

    But is transferred side useful even if it did exist? Can it be controlled? It took pottr quite a few attempts to finally pot that pink...shoot the blue fer christ's sake.
    Just try the example Big Shot posted.
    Put the pink on its spot with the CB a couple of inches behind it.
    Play the shot full ball up the table with left/right hand side and see what happens.
    Now go and pot some balls using what you have just seen to your advantage.
    The subtle version of the shot is easy and can be learned by anyone in weeks.
    The more you want to throw the OB the harder the shot becomes, just like the difference between screwing the white 6 inches compared to 10 feet.

    Leave a comment:


  • travisbickle
    replied
    Originally Posted by Terry Davidson View Post
    C'mon guys, we're at page 99 now and that's pretty good and should go in the record books for vmax. Mr.B.S. deserves special mention for presenting the opposing argument or proven facts as he says.

    The earth is flat, the twin towers was a CIA plot, NASA is lying about the moon landing (even though you can see footprints with a good telescope), Mr. B.S. has faith in SIT, god is real, we all go to heaven or hell, christian fundamentalists managed to change the path of Irma through prayer (they're claiming), Donald Trump never lies and someone on here believes in transferred side (generated by a kick). They're all a bit dodgy in my opinion.

    But is transferred side useful even if it did exist? Can it be controlled? It took pottr quite a few attempts to finally pot that pink...shoot the blue fer christ's sake.
    Will this be vmax' s first ton lol

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X