
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2016 World Championship discussion
Collapse
X
-
Originally Posted by itsnoteasy View PostObviously not big enough for Selby to make a decent break, but wait a minute he's ran out of position( again) and rolled up behind the yellow, riveting stuff, it's what legends are made of. Never mind pin point positioning and perfectly crafted century breaks let's watch that roll up in slow motion, you won't see a better shot played in the championship than that, well not untill his next shot which may be a roll up behind the green, I can hardly contain myself
Leave a comment:
-
I find this match boring as hell........Hope the winner, whoever it is, will play better during the final.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by itsnoteasy View PostNot a rant, an observation, one swallow doesn't make a summer, that puts the world number one still behind the qualifier on decent breaks in this match.
Why do you think one frame justifies all the garbage he's played before?We all know Selby is on his B-game atm so getting this far is an achievement in itself. How often do we hear players criticised for not being able to cope when they're not on top form, which of course happens to everyone.
World No. 1 and 5th in the century list with 417, very difficult to get there by just constantly rolling up to the yellow.
Interesting to note that we've got No. 5(Selby), 6(Ding), and 7(Fu) top century break makers in this semi. I was quite surprised to see Fu there with 394.
-Last edited by PatBlock; 30 April 2016, 11:25 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
That's better, nice break from Fu to level the score again. Selby has responded each time Fu's come back at him so far, but we are approaching the business end of the match now, so the pressure will increase. :smile:
I'm out for lunch, so will watch the rest of the session later. 12-12 would be nice. :smile:
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by itsnoteasy View PostNot a rant, an observation, one swallow doesn't make a summer, that puts the world number one still behind the qualifier on decent breaks in this match.
Why do you think one frame justifies all the garbage he's played before?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by neil taperell View PostMarco needed that frame , looked like Selby was going to run away with this session.
Saw a lot of movement from Selby when he missed the red to the middle in that frame .
Leave a comment:
-
Marco needed that frame , looked like Selby was going to run away with this session.
Saw a lot of movement from Selby when he missed the red to the middle in that frame .
Leave a comment:
-
Not a rant, an observation, one swallow doesn't make a summer, that puts the world number one still behind the qualifier on decent breaks in this match.
Why do you think one frame justifies all the garbage he's played before?Last edited by itsnoteasy; 30 April 2016, 10:27 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by itsnoteasy View PostObviously not big enough for Selby to make a decent break, but wait a minute he's ran out of position( again) and rolled up behind the yellow, riveting stuff, it's what legends are made of. Never mind pin point positioning and perfectly crafted century breaks let's watch that roll up in slow motion, you won't see a better shot played in the championship than that, well not untill his next shot which may be a roll up behind the green, I can hardly contain myself
Leave a comment:
-
Originally Posted by trains View PostI think a lot of people prefer and remember quality safety battles like Selby vs Baird to century's.
With lots of century's
1.There's a lot of dead frame time once the opponent needs too many snookers.
2.Unless the player in break is going for a max or a tournament high break - unless its pots of the lampshades and superb positioning whats the big deal.
3.The oft inevitable cry rightly or wrongly that the pockets are too generous.
Just my slight ot take though. :-)
Leave a comment:
-
Who saw the end of Eurosport last night? A bit weird. Ronnie Wood was there, Colin Murray was drunk. There was a dog in the studio.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: